{"id":11023,"date":"2021-02-03T19:08:34","date_gmt":"2021-02-04T03:08:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vinsuprynowicz.com\/?p=11023"},"modified":"2021-02-04T21:52:26","modified_gmt":"2021-02-05T05:52:26","slug":"backstabbing-never-trumper-ted-cruz-asserts-president-trump-did-not-prove-election-fraud-in-any-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vinsuprynowicz.com\/?p=11023","title":{"rendered":"Backstabbing Never-Trumper Ted Cruz asserts President Trump \u2018did not prove election fraud in any court\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Backstabber Ted Cruz is back, asserting President Trump \u201cdid not prove (massive) election fraud in any court.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(See: https:\/\/bigleaguepolitics.com\/sen-ted-cruz-says-reckless-and-irresponsible-trump-could-not-prove-election-fraud\/<\/a> )<\/p>\n\n\n\n

OK, Ted: Which court agreed, back before the cases became moot on Jan. 6 , to spend at least a couple of days allowing Sidney Powell — or any other of Trump\u2019s representatives \u2013 to air at least A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT of the evidence of election fraud in open court? Not talking about the Democrat judges or the 9 pieces of shit once referred to as \u201cThe U.S. Supreme Court\u201d who hid in the basement and refused to hear the case on \u201cprocedural\u201d or \u201cjurisdictional\u201d grounds, here, Ted. Which court REVIEWED ALL THE EVIDENCE IN PUBLIC, so we could watch?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Law professor Davide K. Clements confirms there was \u201csignificant\u201d election fraud \u2013 court cases have been dismissed on \u201cprocess\u201d ground only, NO COURT has reviewed the evidence):<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
Update on the BIG LIE: Law Professor Confirms Election Fraud Evidence Is “Significant” – Cases Only Dismissed on Process Grounds Not Merit<\/a><\/blockquote>