{"id":517,"date":"2010-05-16T05:38:37","date_gmt":"2010-05-16T12:38:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vinsuprynowicz.com\/?p=517"},"modified":"2011-10-09T13:15:02","modified_gmt":"2011-10-09T20:15:02","slug":"on-the-%e2%80%98path-to-citizenship%e2%80%99-and-the-myth-of-%e2%80%98mandatory-spending%e2%80%99","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vinsuprynowicz.com\/?p=517","title":{"rendered":"On the \u2018Path to citizenship\u2019 and the myth of \u2018mandatory spending\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I don\u2019t know how it facilitates a sober, studious, academic environment to allow kids at Live Oak High School in Morgan Hill, Cal. to EITHER wear American flag gear or paint their faces and bodies in red, white, and green to celebrate Cinco de Mayo (a fun Mexican holiday but still a fairly minor one, the date of an insignificant victory over the invading French no longer even observed as a federal holiday in Mexico, instead having apparently grown popular in this country after being promoted as a marketing gimmick by the distributors of Corona beer. If Mexicans hate the French so much why do they keep playing Mariachi music?)<\/p>\n<p>Though perhaps it\u2019s my use of adjectives like \u201cstudious\u201d and \u201cacademic\u201d in connection with a modern government-run high school that\u2019s really absurd.<\/p>\n<p>At any rate, it surely showed the Three Stooges level to which current \u201cmulticultural\u201d political correctness has descended when Assistant Principal Miguel Rodriguez at said youth propaganda camp on May 5 told a group of Anglo kids they had to turn their American-flag T-shirts inside-out or be sent home.<\/p>\n<p>One of the boys\u2019 mothers told NBC Bay Area, \u201cThey said we could wear it on any other day, but today is sensitive to Mexican-Americans because it\u2019s supposed to be their holiday so we were not allowed to wear it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>As the Review-Journal editorialized last week, \u201cMind you, the kids could have worn red T-shirts with a gold hammer and sickle, or shirts displaying the countenance of a mass murderer such as Mao, Lenin, or Che Guevara &#8212; that would have been fine. In fact, more than 100 students were spotted wearing the colors of the Mexican flag &#8212; red, white and green &#8212; as they left the school, including some who had those colors painted on their faces or arms.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s hard to imagine any other nation on earth whose populace would be so patient, for so long, at such in-your-face outrages to their national pride and sovereignty.<\/p>\n<p>Not the \u201cMexican colors\u201d thing. That was fine, like wearing green on St. Patrick\u2019s Day. I\u2019m talking about the notion that \u201cshowing the Stars &amp; Stripes\u201d might offend anyone who has chosen to come to America.<\/p>\n<p>Are there four people in your family? Imagine five \u201cundocumented visitors\u201d breaking down your front door, pitching tents in your living room, and then \u201cvoting\u201d on how to divvy up the food in the refrigerator.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s illegal immigration \u201cwith a path to citizenship,\u201d which has flooded the West with hostile and self-righteous aliens, whom even Assistant Principal Rodriguez fears could become violent at the drop of a hat.<\/p>\n<p>Kind of like giving your daughter\u2019s rapist a \u201cpath to fatherhood.\u201d Criminals should be rewarded for violating the law by being given what they most desire (ahead of those who waited patiently in line, showed they could speak English and had in-demand job skills, etc.), so long as they \u201ctried really hard\u201d &#8230; right?<\/p>\n<p>Yes, in a Libertarian paradise there\u2019d be no obligation to pay taxes to fund the schooling and medical care of illegal invaders, and this pragmatic complaint would be largely voided.<\/p>\n<p>But a) I don\u2019t see the \u201cpurging of the Shire\u201d coming to redistributionist Washington City real soon, and b) doesn\u2019t the freedom of association mean I should be able to \u201cvote with my feet,\u201d moving to a community within this country where we could deny the franchise to any hater of the free market, any socialist looter &#8212; where such characters would have no opportunity to enlist the armed force of government in their cause of rectifying the \u201cunfairness of the distribution of wealth hereabouts\u201d? What remaining state or county is that?<\/p>\n<p>If the government won\u2019t keep its part of the bargain &#8212; ensuring us a set of sovereign state governments under an umbrella federal republic of limited powers specifically enumerated, while leaving the vast majority of non-violent human activities untaxed and unregulated &#8212; why then should the populace continue to act as though it\u2019s under any obligation to concede, respect, or obey the supposed authority of such a government, once it\u2019s abandoned any credible pretext that it continues to operate under any of the restraints of the \u201climited\u201d grant of power issued by our duped ancestors, 200 years gone?<\/p>\n<p>Meantime, goad us just a little more, \u201creconquista\u201d illegals. Come on. Perhaps Assistant Principal Miguel Rodriguez would like to call a press conference, put an American flag on the ground, do a little Mexican hat dance, and then piss on it.<\/p>\n<p>Surely the California teachers union would make sure he got a \u201cstep raise\u201d for that.<\/p>\n<p># # #<\/p>\n<p>Letter-writer Dan Wulz of Henderson complains the Republican primary candidates all \u201cadhere to the Republican mantra of lower taxes and smaller government, but what they SAY is not what they DO or WANT once you penetrate past the slogan. <strong>Republicans<\/strong> want Big Government when it\u2019s used to advance their ideology.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>As examples, Mr. Wulz lists GOP support for military spending, \u201cso they can fuel the military-industrial complex and fight far-flung wars of conquest\u201d and for continued drug prohibition, \u201cmeaning they want such persons put IN PRISON = Big Government. &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>\u201cLastly, once they cut taxes, they never articulate what government they\u2019re going to cut to balance the budget.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>All valid complaints. Then Mr. Wulz continues:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBudget deficits have skyrocketed under Reagan and both Bushes (and now also with Obama, but no one can deny he inherited a catastrophe of epic proportions.) Defense (23 percent), Social Security (20 percent), Medicare\/Medicaid (19 percent), other mandatory spending (17 percent), and interest (5 percent) comprise 84 percent of the FY 2009 federal budget. Only 12 percent is discretionary. (4 percent is TARP, which even Bush and every responsible economist believed was absolutely necessary to save the economy).<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAny rational voter should ask any candidate: if you\u2019re going to cut taxes, what part of the budget are you going to cut to avoid a deficit and balance the budget?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Now we must differ. Any \u201ccatastrophe\u201d Mr. Obama inherited would have best been solved by slashing federal spending, allowing the nation\u2019s excellent system of bankruptcy courts to liquidate the assets of the giant \u201croulette wheel\u201d banks which Mr. Obama &#8212; like George W. Bush before him &#8212; has spent our patrimony propping up.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s not true that only 12 percent of current federal spending is \u201cdiscretionary.\u201d \u201cDefense\u201d spending could easily be cut in half, while still leaving us a Navy strong enough to patrol the sea lanes. Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, far from being \u201cmandatory,\u201d are in fact unconstitutional. They could and should be ended quickly.<\/p>\n<p>No economist for whom I have any respect believes TARP did anything but lengthen the current depression. Far from being \u201cnecessary to save the economy,\u201d it has helped doom it.<\/p>\n<p>But Mr. Wulz is correct when he says \u201cAny rational voter should ask any candidate: if you\u2019re going to cut taxes, what part of the budget are you going to cut to avoid a deficit and balance the budget?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Which party has for 40 years offered candidates who can &#8212; without lying &#8212; vow to slash federal spending AND taxes, thus balancing the federal budget at a spending level less than half of today\u2019s?<\/p>\n<p>Only the Libertarian Party. So why is it the Libertarian Party &#8212; again, as ever &#8212; will draw less than 4 percent of the vote this fall? Why is it I doubt even Mr. Wulz (and most others who pretend they\u2019d like the GOP to stay \u201ctrue to its principles\u201d) will vote for them?<\/p>\n<p>If you keep voting for lying thieves &#8212; no matter whether they call themselves Republicrats or Demopublicans &#8212; how can you expect things to change?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I don\u2019t know how it facilitates a sober, studious, academic environment to allow kids at Live Oak High School in Morgan Hill, Cal. to EITHER wear American flag gear or paint their faces and bodies in red, white, and green to celebrate Cinco de Mayo (a fun Mexican holiday but still a fairly minor one, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_hide_featured_image":false,"_jetpack_featured_image_duplicate_dismissed":0,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[39,15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-517","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-2010-election","category-immigration"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pWqFl-8l","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vinsuprynowicz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/517","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vinsuprynowicz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vinsuprynowicz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vinsuprynowicz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vinsuprynowicz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=517"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/vinsuprynowicz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/517\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":880,"href":"https:\/\/vinsuprynowicz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/517\/revisions\/880"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vinsuprynowicz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=517"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vinsuprynowicz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=517"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vinsuprynowicz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=517"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}