‘We’ve had free and fair elections and we’ve accepted the outcomes when we may not have liked them and that is what must be expected’


During an interview aired on the July 14 edition of CNN’s “Axe Files,” aging black Congressman John Lewis, D-Ga. (far left above, staging a sit-in against gun rights on the floor — literally on the floor — of the House of Representatives last year), stated he believes the 2016 presidential election was “rigged” in Donald Trump’s favor.

CNN Senior Political Commentator and far-left Obama flack David Axelrod asked Lewis, “So, despite the fact that he got the requisite number of electoral votes, you . . . think the election was rigged in his favor?”

Lewis answered, “I truly believe to this day, that this election was rigged in his favor.”

By . . . all those people in America’s political class and their blowjob love-slaves in the Lamestream Media who wanted to see a Trump victory so they’d lose all their power, like prancing sycophants exposed by the little boy who declared “The emperor has no clothes” — folks like Obama sponsor Bill Ayers who wedded themselves to the violent hard-left global collectivists back in the 1960s, and had just finally decided by last November that it was time to give up and “arrange” their own defeat?

Who the hell else could have “rigged the election” for Trump? The Martians? Mr. Lewis didn’t notice Trump drawing tens of thousands of people to rallies -– three and four rallies a day -– while the stumbling Hillary Clinton clearly had to be doped up to stage two rallies a week for fifty high-school girls in a college gym?

(Hillary doped up, see: . . . http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/09/dr_ted_noel_explains_why_the_pneumonia_story_is_bunk_and_hillary_likely_has_parkinsons.html , . . . or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zr1IDQ2V1eM , . . . or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5mYx5oCxEg .)

All those blue-collar workers in coal- and oil-related industries holding meetings to switch their registrations from Democrat to Republican in Pennsylvania last fall after hearing what Trump had to say? Is that what he calls “rigging the election”?

(Pennsylvanians switched reegistrations to Republican due to Trump: http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/10/13/pennsylvania-republican-party-registers-over-243000-new-voters-including-nearly-100000-former-democrats/ ; or . . . http://www.duluthnewstribune.com/news/politics/4016904-more-60000-disgruntled-pennsylvania-democrats-switch-parties .)

Back during their final televised debate in October, 2016, you may remember anti-Trump Pomeranian Chris Wallace pressing Donald Trump to vow he would respect and accept the results of the upcoming November balloting. “What I’m saying is I will tell you at the time,” Trump replied. “I’ll keep you in suspense.”

Hillary Clinton – as their presidential nominee, the leader of Congressman Lewis’ party — replied “That’s horrifying. That’s not the way our democracy works. We’ve been around 240 years. We’ve had free and fair elections and we’ve accepted the outcomes when we may not have liked them and that is what must be expected of anyone standing on a debate stage during a general election. President Obama said the other day that when you’re whining before the game is even finished it just shows you’re not even up to doing the job.“

She added, “And let’s be clear about what he’s saying and what he means. He’s denigrating—he’s talking down our democracy. I for one am appalled that somebody who is the nominee of one of our major two parties would take that kind of position.”

Mrs. Clinton was wrong about America being “a democracy,” of course. The Founders, who abhorred the idea of direct mob rule, established for us a representative Republic.

Otherwise, though, she had a pretty good point. Back in 1960 Richard Nixon knew full well there was a lot of chicanery behind John Kennedy and the Democrats capturing the electoral votes of Illinois and West Virginia. But Nixon firmly declined to challenge the outcome of the November vote, explaining it would weaken Americans’ faith in the process, that it “wouldn’t be good for the country.”

Yet what are the “resist-at-any-cost” Democrats -– including Hillary Clinton, by the way — and their shrieking handmaidens in the press doing now? Aren’t they doing precisely what Hillary Clinton fumed and stormed about, last October? Didn’t CNN political commentator Angela Rye on Monday (July 17), in a discussion with former Republican congressman Jack Kingston, repeatedly insist on referring to Donald Trump as “your president,” pointedly refusing to acknowledge he’s “her president”?

Is that “accepting the outcome of the election (even though) we may not have liked it”? Or is it only Republicans (as usual) who are required to “be gentlemanly and dignified and grownup and play by the rules”?


So as not to be unclear, the RIGHT thing for Democrats and their captive cunnilingual media to do now — the best thing for the COUNTRY — would be to say “Aha. I get what you’re saying. We lost. Funny I hadn’t noticed that. The Trump people won an honest victory that wasn’t even close -– his Electoral College margin was so massive that there wasn’t any single state or even any two states where we could send in the lawyers and demand a recount, like we always do, otherwise.

“The voters rejected our agenda, which really wasn’t much of an agenda other than higher taxes; more pointless “Green” regulations to cripple commerce, industry, the development of coal, oil, gas, and jobs; federal regulators running rampant everywhere including setting bathroom policy in elementary schools; a ‘minimum wage’ so high that teen-agers can no longer find summer jobs because the fast food restaurants have replaced them with robots; . . .

. . . open borders to admit unlimited millions of MS-13 gang members and murderous Islamic terrorists IN VIOLATION OF THE CURRENT, BIPARTISAN-APPROVED IMMIGRATION LAWS; “sanctuaries” for illegal alien rapists and murderers and child molesters and genital mutilators so ICE can’t arrest and deport them; and a transgender ideology based on destroying ‘traditional gender roles’ by injecting children with hormones and dressing up our little boys in dresses which in the end is just as suicidal for a race and a culture as cutting the balls off all our little boys as though we were neutering tomcats.

“Basically, behind all our euphemisms, we’re a bunch of self-loathing communists and the problem is that communism crashed and burned of its own dysfunctional absurdity 26 years ago. It didn’t need to be overthrown, mind you. It collapsed of its own absurdity. Doesn’t work; never worked; won’t work now, no matter whether you call it ‘progressivism,’ the ‘rainbow coalition,’ whatever.

“In fact, whether we like it or not, the American people want jobs, borders, patriotism, smaller government, lower taxes, far fewer crippling regulations, stock car races, and a booming economy, and none of what we’re selling -– no Sharia law; no globalism, no Global Warming nonsense, no more of the gender-bender crap. Didn’t work. Instead of just shrieking that anyone who opposes us on ANYTHING is a “racist,” maybe it’s time for us to come up with a new agenda.”

But the Democrats and their howling media lapdogs aren’t doing that, are they? Nooooo. Instead they’re shrieking that they must “resist” — “slow-walking” even Trump’s routine appointments, necessary for him to get a grip on the federal executive bureaucracy to put into place the common-sense agenda the people voted for, appointments usually OK’d by even a hostile Senate as a matter of routine within a few months at most. At the current pace he’ll see the last of his 1,200 routine appointments OK’d in ELEVEN YEARS (long after he’s left office) -– and this while his Republican Party holds the majority in BOTH HOUSES!

(Eleven years, see: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/mitch-mcconnell-trump-nominations-will-take-11-years-thanks-to-senate-democrats/article/2628885 ; or http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/11/republicans-say-it-will-take-years-to-confirm-trump-nominees/ .)

Meantime, the Democrats and their hired, Soros-funded street thugs ( http://dailycaller.com/2017/02/03/look-who-funds-the-group-behind-the-call-to-arms-at-milos-berkeley-event/ ) set fires, throw bottles, shut down free speech by conservatives on every American campus, and shriek that we must “impeach Donald Trump” for no crimes or misdemeanors, high or otherwise — in fact for no reason other than the fact they DON”T WANT TO ADMIT THEY LOST, demonstrating for all to see that their power to manipulate the masses through lies, euphemisms and misdirection is coming to an end.

(Does it never dawn on them that perhaps some of us grown-ups were a trifle concerned, nine years ago, when they elected as President a half-term Senator of no demonstrated accomplishments who won election to the U.S. Senate thanks only to the “mysterious” and thoroughly illegal release of his opponent’s divorce-custody records; a son of communists who the son curiously insists were unmarried, whose declared mentor, his “Uncle” Frank Marshall Davis, was a longtime member of the CPUSA; an avowed acolyte of the satanist “community organizer” Saul “The Red” Alinsky, follower of the Rev. “God Damn America” Wright; whose political career was launched in the living room of a man who used to make bombs to blow up police stations (and the Pentagon) and says he wishes he’d made more; a candidate who as a youth was registered for school in Indonesia as a “Muslim,” who has written he finds the Muslim call to prayer “the most beautiful sound in the world,” a man who AS PRESIDENT made a World Apology Tour and bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia? Yet did we put on masks, set fires, throw rocks and bottles, burn Barack Hussein Obama in effigy, call for his immediate impeachment or — failing that — his assassination? Did we scream “Not My President” and work to make sure even his routine appointments of assistant deputy Secretaries of State and Justice and Treasury would take 11 years to confirm? We did not. None of it.)


Over men and horses, hoops and garters, lastly through a hogshead of real fire? Mr. Kite had nothing on the carnival we’ve seen on display in recent weeks as the Fake News media attempt to railroad Donald Trump, Jr. -– who’s not a federal employee, by the way, who has no “security clearance,” and who thus has nothing to fear from these barking minority yippy-dogs -– by claiming he did something illegal (even “treasonous”!) when he took a meeting last summer with a Russian lady lawyer.

OK, it turns out this wasn’t the meeting they’re looking for — the one where Vlad “The Impaler” Putin sent word that he’d direct the Magic Gamma Rays from his Secret Space Satellite to throw the election results to Trump in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan and Wisconsin in return for a vow of fealty from the elder Trump, the least bought-and-paid-for presidential candidate since Andrew Jackson kneeling naked to kiss the little Russian’s butt and promise in exchange to take all future secret orders emnanating from the Dark Kingdom of Mordor (a “Russian plot” which thanks to the Jonathan Allen-Amie Parnes book “Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign” we now know was INVENTED OUT OF THIN AIR to explain their defeat by John Podesta and Sissy Mook the day AFTER the election.) No, not that meeting.

But wait! It turns out Donald Trump Jr. agreed to the half-hour meeting when he was (wrongly) informed the Russian lady might have some useful negative information to convey about Hillary Clinton!

Whoooa! Why, that might almost stoop to the immoral, illegal, traitorous behavior known as “opposition research”! Whoooa!

We all know, for instance, what happened that day last summer that the charming Hillary Clinton, Sissy Mook, and that paragon of ascetic virtue John Podesta, were meeting to discuss the straightforward agenda on which they were going to base Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign –- opening the borders to admit five million more MS-13 gang members and radical Islamic terrorists each year; raising the minimum wage to $15 or, heck, maybe $20 an hour so no black or Hispanic teen-ager would ever again be able to land another entry-level job at a fast-food restaurant or anywhere else; rounding up America’s five-year-olds, injecting the boys with estrogen and the girls with testosterone so they’ll all grow up to be hermaphrodites and we’ll finally be rid of all these hideous stereotyped gender roles — when the receptionist rang them to say:

“There’s a young man out here named Billy Bush; he says he has an audio recording you all might be interested in, says it’s Donald Trump, way back before he got involved in politics, saying the word ‘pussy,’ saying women will ‘let him grab their pussy.’”

“Send him away!” John Podesta famously thundered (as we all recall so well.) “I’m appalled that he’d even think we’d use such a thing in our campaign. What does he think we’re involved in, . . . ‘Opposition research’?!”

“OK,” the receptionist replied. “And I guess that would apply to this Miss Machado who’s also waiting out here, the former beauty queen and Playboy Magazine stripper and getaway driver for that Venezuelan assassin, who says Mr. Trump ‘fat-shamed’ her?”

“Of course it does!” stormed Mrs. Clinton, unable to contain herself. “What do you think we’re running here, a Bimbo Eruption Team? Tell her we’re certainly not going to stoop so low as to use material like THAT in our campaign! Why, it would lower the whole level of the national political discourse! That would practically amount to ‘Opposition Research’!”

“OK, ma’am. My apologies for bothering you. And the six gray-haired Clinton-donor ladies who say they’re willing to claim – though not under oath, you understand – that Mr. Trump ‘bumped’ or ‘groped’ them 11 to 18 years ago? I’ll tell them we’re not interested in that kind of stuff, either?”

Yep. All good Democrats and Hillary supporters know that “Opposition research” stuff is WAY out of line in the kind of elevated, issue-oriented campaigns THEY prefer to wage.

For the irony-impaired, the point is that -– with the exception of one weird TV ad with multiracial zombies shuffling across the camera’s field of view holding candles, as a voice-over advised us “not to give up the progress we’re made” (apparently implying Donald Trump meant to repeal the Civil Rights Acts, re-segregate the public schools, and take away the voting rights of women and black folk), Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign was nothing BUT opposition research and scurrilous, thoroughly orchestrated and stage-managed, below-the-belt attacks.

That’s all she had! At a time when she knew her lapdog leftist media wouldn’t utter a peep about how she was too drunk or comatose to order a rescue mission in Benghazi, how she destroyed thousands of emails she knew were under subpoena (smashing some of her devices with a hammer — http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/294465-cnn-anchor-stunned-that-clinton-aides-destroyed-phones-with ), how she and husband Bill accepted tens of million in “speaking fees” and bribes thinly disguised as “donations to the Clinton Foundation” for approving the Russian uranium deal ( http://www.breitbart.com/hillary-clinton/2016/05/01/one-year-silence-hillary-clinton-uranium-deal/ ), etc., etc.


One Comment to “‘We’ve had free and fair elections and we’ve accepted the outcomes when we may not have liked them and that is what must be expected’”

  1. K. Bill Hodges Says:

    Looking forward to tomorrow. Thanks, Vin.