We’re fed up, and we’re not going to take this much longer

Axios — one of dozens of interchangeable, far-Left, statist Internet “news” sites — on Aug. 20 asked several White House aids, (anonymously, of course), why they stay in the service of Donald Trump.

( https://www.axios.com/axios-am-2475003501.html?rebelltitem=1#rebelltitem1&utm_medium=linkshare&utm_campaign=organic .)

“We talked to a half dozen senior administration officials, who range from dismayed but certain to stay, to disgusted and likely soon to leave. They all work closely with Trump and his senior team so, of course, wouldn’t talk on the record. Instead, they agreed to let us distill their thinking/rationale:

“‘You have no idea how much crazy stuff we kill’: The most common response centers on the urgent importance of having smart, sane people around Trump to fight his worst impulses,” Axios continues. “If they weren’t there, they say, we would have a trade war with China, massive deportations, and a government shutdown to force construction of a Southern wall.”

OK. Here’s the thing: Only one man in our nation’s history has ever made (not inherited) a billion dollars in business, demonstrated the capability to be successful on television and to keep tens of thousands of people spellbound and cheering with his live, off-the-cuff political speeches, married unusually smart and beautiful women, raised unusually successful children, and then been willing to give up a luxurious and well-deserved billionaire’s retirement to subject himself to the vicious, irrational, demented abuse of a bunch of losers in order to be elected — against all odds — president of the United States . . . in order to save this country and its economy from a bunch of depraved, out-of-touch socialists.

If you’re some dufus hanger-on who’s never demonstrated you can meet payroll and turn a profit running so much as a hot dog stand, yet believe you’re both smarter and “more sane” than Donald Trump, please quit immediately.

Because the stuff you call “crazy stuff” is what we want.

I’m from Nevada. All of Nevada votes Republican, most of the time, except for Clark County/Las Vegas, where the Culinary Union bragged again last fall about busing their hotel-maid union members to the polls for early voting (bribing them with box lunches.) The reporter for the Las Vegas Sun interviewed those voters in Spanish, clearly indicating they didn’t speak much English.

To become a naturalized U.S. citizen, you have to demonstrate competency speaking English.

In Nevada, as in California and every other state where illegal voters ran up the popular vote for Hillary Clinton last year, there’s no need to prove you’re a citizen in order to register to vote.

In fact, Nevada Motor Vehicle employees are instructed to offer those receiving drivers’ licenses a chance to fill out a form to register to vote, EVEN IF THE IDENTITY DOCUMENT PRESENTED IS A “GREEN CARD,” demonstrating the new driver is NOT a U.S. citizen. In many states, it’s actually ILLEGAL TO ASK someone registering to vote whether they’re a U.S. citizen, or even whether they’re an illegal alien.


Unless we start requiring proof of citizenship to register and vote — which the Democrats won’t allow, insisting that constitutes “black voter suppression” since their black constituents are too dumb to figure out how to actually prove their identity (please note that’s not MY position; it’s the position which the Democrat Party insistently shrieks at the top of their lungs) — there’s only one way to stop illegal voters — many of them illegal aliens — from corrupting our election process by out-voting and thus blocking the will of legitimate, legal voters in states like Nevada and California. And that’s “massive deportations.”

That’s one reason — in addition to our desire to limit terrorism, rapes, murders, honor killings, female genital muitilation, and the crime waves being fomented by MS-13 gang members — that we want them. That we want mass deportations.

Who’s at fault for the fact we now need to do this? “Racist Republicans”? No, smarmy lying Democrats who have been telling us ever since Reagan OK’d an illegal-alien amnesty 30 years ago that they’d “secure the border . . . real soon. Honest. Trust us.”

If they “secured the border” as they promised us 30 years ago, who are all these aliens for whom they now favor “sanctuary” and “amnesty?” They’re not all using canes and walkers. Where’d they COME from? Mars?

My former Nevada Democratic Congresswoman, Shelley Berkley, once told me in an editorial board meeting (lots of witnesses) that “Of course we agree we need to secure the southern border; we’re going to secure the border.” I asked her if they’d use land mines. She looked shocked and said “Of course no one is talking about THAT.” Why not? Put them between two eight-foot fences well marked with signs in several languages; it would cut way down on expensive manpower requirements. No one could possibly be injured or killed, since Demorats were again assuring us they were going to “secure the southern border.” Unless, of course, my congresscritter was . . . lying through her teeth.

Furthermore, forget this business about illegal aliens committing felonies (including rape and/or murder) AFTER THEY’VE BEEN DEPORTED SIX TIMES, or 15 times, or whatever.

(See . . . http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/14/mexican-illegal-alien-deported-ten-times-since-2010-charged-with-child-rape/ , . . . or http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/07/illegal_oregon_rape_suspect_deported_at_least_13_times_since_2008.html , or . . . http://eaglerising.com/45971/illegal-immigrant-rape-suspect-had-been-deported-20-times/ , etc.)

What are we running here, the funny clown-car stunt from the circus? Being caught a third time should bring two years at hard labor. Being caught a fifth time should get you dropped off in an open boat in the middle of the Pacific, 800 miles from the nearest land, with a couple gallons of fresh water and a fishing line.

Have you ever heard of anyone being deported from Russia or China or Saudi Arabia or even Mexico a SIXTH TIME? I didn’t think so.

A “government shutdown to force construction of a southern wall”? Yes! Please! The Democrats have been using this ridiculous, Kabuki-theater bluff against chickenshit Republicans for decades. But Trump should do it differently.

Just shutting down a few national parks and tourist attractions — while still keeping rangers on duty to issue tickets to those who enter such areas without paying a fee? Oh, please.


The president should announce “If 40-some Democrats — a MINORITY, thanks to the votes and wishes of you, the American people — want to see the government shut down rather than vote for a budget resolution that includes at least a billion dollars for construction of the border wall that the American people overwhelmingly want — a billion dollars which we can easily get back, by the way, simply by taxing the ‘remittances’ Mexicans send home to Mexico, and taxing Mexican oil -– if those Democrats refuse to fund the continued operation of the U.S. government, than at midnight tomorrow night I’ll have no choice but to shut down the federal government, for lack of funds. No choice. Their call.

“But don’t think this means just closing the Washington Monument and Yellowstone Park and a few museums. Oh no. I’ll figure out some way to keep our dedicated military personnel on duty, and our prison guards. We’re not going to let the federal prisoners starve -– though we may have to start a really big expedited release program, there, for U.S. citizens.

“No, I mean there won’t be any money to pay members of Congress or their staffs, or our federal judges or their staffs. I’ll be ordering the electricity shut off at virtually every federal government office, including the courthouses and the Capitol building -– no choice, because these Democrats won’t authorize money to pay the electric bills. They think this is just pretend? The doors to those buildings will be locked.

“We’ll be shutting down the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Energy, the Department of Education, the BATF, the Bureau of Land Management, the Department of Agriculture, the Federal Reserve Board, many many largely unnecessary federal agencies. Who knows whether some of them will ever fully open again? We’ll have to see. A lot of money to be saved, there. And now Democrats want them all closed for an unlimited time? Fine with me. I welcome our Democrat friends to the cause of serious, fiscal conservatism and cost-saving.

“Unfortunately, those workers will not be paid for the time those offices and departments will be closed. Not ever. There will be no retroactive pay. Those who quit during this unpaid shut-down will not be replaced. When the Democrats cave in -– because here’s a list of the names of those 46 Democrat senators and two Socialist senators and their phone numbers and their e-mail addresses, I hope anyone who’s worried about this shutdown, especially our unionized federal employees, will let them hear from you -– none of those federal workers are going to get back pay for that time. Which could be a year or more, I don’t know. Not up to me.

“Sorry. This will be an unpaid holiday for the federal government and all its workers, including me, the same as when a private business has to shut down for lack of funds.

“No national Christmas tree, let me tell you. And the government employee unions? I don’t think they’re going to be very happy. No back pay or “catch-up” benefits when it’s over. I wonder if they’ll want to start calling and e-mailing some of the Democrats and Socialists on this list, here. Because I would definitely advise them to start hunting for other jobs.

“Remember what this is about. The Democrats are willing to shut down the federal government rather than fund a border wall which I have deemed necessary for our national security — and the voters overwhemingly agree with me — because they favor open borders and sanctuary and amnesty for illegal aliens. Because they favor lots more terror bombings and drug gangs and lots more honor killings and lots more female genital mutilation by these illegal aliens.

“Well, it’s their choice, until such time as Republicans decide to change these matters to a straight majority vote in the Senate, which the majority Republicans there could do today. But this time, let’s make it a REAL government shutdown. OK?”


What was their third example of “crazy stuff”? A “trade war with China”?

I’ve always been in favor of free trade. Trade embargos, after all, just mean Americans pay more for goods. But you know what? Given that our stores are full of Chinese goods, if it’s true that the Communist Chinese are using all kinds of devious tricks and schemes to keep U.S. goods and products out of their own stores — or just peddling knockoffs of our stuff without paying licensing fees — then I say we can live for a long time without a single additional Chinese import.

Especially when buying those products only props up a regressive, totalitarian Communist regime that jails and kills Tibetan nuns and other freedom fighters.

If they’re so clean, so blameless, why is Red China “pushing back against the U.S. this week after the Trump administration said it would launch an investigation of Chinese theft of intellectual property.” ( http://www.breitbart.com/economics/2017/08/24/china-vows-resist-u-s-trade-probe-all-means-necessary/ .)

What have they got to hide?

Bring it on. Is this the most powerful nation in the world, or are we Albania? We’re sick and tired of being told all the things we “can’t possibly do.” You’re telling me China doesn’t need this market?

(I should probably note that this COULD be purposeful misdirection — it certainly gives Trump a stronger negotiating stance if the Chinese BELIEVE his aides are scared to death he’ll launch a full-out trade war.)

White House aides should not be looking to cobble together “deals” that sell out the agenda on which Trump won the office for a handful of trinkets (a “Dreamer” amnesty for every illegal under the age of 45 in exchange for a hundred yards of border wall?) and that wonderful, soothing feeling of the Washington Amazon-Post saying “Finally they’re being REASONABLE; they’re MATURING IN OFFICE.”

(Insert lovesick sigh.)

Instead they should be sent out to the red states, put to work making sure at least three RINO senators who have thumbed their noses at their own party’s president are left lying on the side of the road with a bad case of asphalt burn in the primaries next spring and summer, and then move on to winning the TRUMP Republican party 10 more Senate seats, 15 months from now (which will get a lot easier once we’ve deported the first 10 million illegal aliens, along with their voter registration cards, believe me.)

It’s not the PRESIDENT who needs to change. President Trump’s first job is to not be Hillary Clinton — a job he’s been doing very, very well, every day. His second job is to veto or otherwise reverse far-left nonsense like crippling our economy based on the long-disproven “man-made global warming” scam (Polar bears extinct yet, Al Gore? Lots of cities and Pacific islands now underwater, as predicted?) or crippling our military’s fighting ability by turning it into a big “transgender” experiment.

(Notice all those recent fatal warship crashes in the Pacific? Will they ever tell us how many had mixed male-female crews, from which hard-to-replace female ratings and specialists had recently been removed due to becoming pregnant while onboard, leaving those crews short-handed in one or more vital areas? But symbolic social engineering is more important, isn’t it?)

Trump should not be rushed into signing “just any bill” in a rush to show he’s “getting something done.” Better to “get nothing done” than to get the wrong things done. Did anyone think he’d succeed in “Draining the Swamp” in his very first year?

We elected Donald Trump because he’s a fighter. What’s your defintion of “presidential,” exactly? Learning to recite your Politically Correct, open borders, transgender catechism with all the words in the right order? Huddling on the floor, letting you piss on him, and saying it tastes pretty good?

As Donald Trump gamely and pugnaciously fights back against endless and insufferable calumnies -– a man who never showed prejudice against any member of any race or minority in a 50-year business career (a man who has Jewish grandchildren, for heaven’s sake) now sneeringly libeled a “Nazi White Supremacist” by spoiled affirmative-action “journalists” and Hollywood types who’ve never done an honest day’s work in their lives . . . and even some in his own party and on his own payroll — these despicable, easily panicked creatures who TAKE DONALD TRUMP’S PAY lie down on their backs, pee all over themselves, and whine “He’s crazy!”

No. He’s a man. And you’re a bunch of pathetic bitches, simpering and greasing up to let Chuckie Schumer make use of your butt-holes once again.

One Comment to “We’re fed up, and we’re not going to take this much longer”

  1. K. Bill Hodges Says:

    Great article. You are absolutely right about DMVs not asking for proof of US citizenship when they register people to vote under Bill Clinton’s Motor Voter law. The state of Arizona actually required motorists who registered at DMV to show proof of US citizenship, and the ACLU sued the state for Voter Suppression and won! Now it’s not legal for any state to ask for proof the motorist is qualified to vote in our elections.

    You can’t make this stuff up.

    (Please try to refrain from resorting to profanity in the future…)