Vin Suprynowicz

Truly Donald Trump is blessed in his enemies. Successful politicians of any party used to be generally cheerful, gregarious types, relatively tall, perky and handsome, the kind of hail-fellows (or gals) well-met you’d generally welcome to liven up a backyard barbecue, folks at least able to PRETEND your problems are their problems and nothing is more important to them than making sure your streetlight and your potholes get fixed.

Yet look at the parade of cretins who’ve decided — rather than spend two years showing they can at least TRY to help solve crises like the Illegal Alien Invasion, unaffordable health care costs, bringing back jobs — they’d rather run for re-election on “Keep scheming to impeach Orange Man, 24/7.”

Literally. Look at them — Stuttering Nancy Pelosi, Bug-eyed Adam Schiff, Elijah Cummings the Human Gumby, and that King of Trolls, pot-bellied, bandy-legged “No-nads Nadler.” (We’re not supposed to ridicule the genetically aberrant — did the man actually start out a dwarf, or is there some kind of “Portrait of Dorian Gray” thing going on here?) They look like a handful of leering goblins frozen in the spotlight of a child’s nightmare.

But beyond that, for them to all be morons, as well? It’s almost too much to accept as random happenstance. They’re actually going to pretend Dirty Cop Mulehead “Could you repeat the question? I’m not familiar . . .” Mueller gave them what they needed to impeach, after a stunned nation watched all four wheels fall off their Hate-Trump wagon on “Mueller Day,” July 24? The day they all sat there intoning, “No one is above the law”?

(See “Sir, Mueller doesn’t know what day it is; he just keeps muttering ‘Not in my purview'”:

https://twitter.com/PolishPatriotTM/status/1154165957893509127 , . . . and the second half is immediately below, also at

https://twitter.com/PolishPatriotTM/status/1154165957893509127 . . . (Click on image to launch audio.)

They meant Donald Trump, of course: a man who’s been under constant audit by the IRS for decades, said IRS having found “nothing . . . nothing” — possibly the only elected official in Washington who hasn’t been bought off by Tom Donahue OR the Red Chinese — the only man in recorded history who even depraved prosecutorial sadist Andrew Weissmann couldn’t figure out how to frame for a crime, for ANY crime.

(Sidney Powell on the ethically challenged Andrew Weissmann:

https://video.foxnews.com/v/5994034287001/#sp=show-clips

Or, for a longer version: https://www.foxnews.com/transcript/sidney-powell-on-robert-muellers-poster-boy-for-prosecutorial-misconduct .

Mark Levin on the “pompous ass” Gerrold Nadler “declaring war on the American people” in the Dimwits’ doomed battle to overturn the election of 2016:

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/07/27/mark-levin-coward-pompous-ass-jerry-nadler-has-declared-war-on-the-american-people/

Or video at: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1155315616171155456

(Just for the record, the American system of justice is supposed to work on the basis of “A crime has been committed — see if you can find out who did it, and then see if there’s enough evidence to prove it.” The very different system based on “Show me the man (who you want to destroy), and I’ll find you the crime” was developed by a very different character named Lavrentiy Beria, who I don’t think you’ll find listed among America’s Founding Fathers, though he was indeed a “white guy.”)

It hasn’t occurred to these croaking toads that when the Gang That Couldn’t Shoot Straight finally get indicted for Seditious Conspiracy to Overthrow the Duly Elected Government of the United States, and their harpies in the press start shrieking in unison “Trump is indicting his political opponents! Tin-Pot Dictator!”, Republicans can just cue up and run the clips of these same halfwits intoning “No one is above the law”?

So you’re not saying James Comey is above the law, right? You’re not saying John Brennan is above the law, surely. Are you saying Rod Rodentstein is above the law? Are you saying Sally Yates is above the law? Are you saying the Clinton Crime Family are above the law?

Or maybe Congressman Cummings, himself?

(For more on crooked Congresscritter Cummings and wife under investigation, see: . . . https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/07/no-human-being-would-want-to-live-there-president-trump-calls-for-investigation-into-elijah-cummingss-dangerous-district/ , or

https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/05/elijah-cummingss-wife-charity/ .)

Because we’ve got clips of you right here saying “NO ONE is above the law.”

Or did you mean a Somali named Ilhan Elmi is “not above the law”?

The Has-Been Media and their cadre of over-the-hill Hollywood cheerleaders have now spent more than a week pretending to be “outraged” over the crowd at a recent Trump rally chanting -– upon the President’s mentioning Somali Congresswoman Ilhan Elmi (who apparently lives here fraudulently under the fake name “Ilhan Omar”) -– “Send Her Back.”

Instead of wading into an absurd debate over whether the chant “Send Her Back” is racist (which word refers to her race?), it might be more productive to ask: What are the circumstances under which deportation might indeed be the proper and legal punishment and remedy for someone who has committed blatant Immigration fraud in order to enter the United States (claiming to be a member of the “Omar” family, for instance, when she’s not) -– and then committed immigration fraud AGAIN (not to mention polyandry — and not even in Utah) by illegally marrying her brother (creating a bit of “overlap” with her marriage to, you know, the father of her children) in order to help get HIM into the United States?

A CURIOUS IMMIGRATION HISTORY

Just for starters, ignore the “deny everything; make counter-accusations” Democrat partisans over at Snopes, and read these:

https://clarion.causeaction.com/2019/07/18/report-ilhan-omar-used-false-name-to-enter-u-s/

https://lauraloomer.us/2019/07/18/report-ilhan-omar-received-asylum-under-false-name/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/07/ilhan-omars-father-was-top-official-in-genocidal-barre-regime-then-he-changed-his-name-to-sneak-into-the-us-illegally/

https://www.city-journal.org/html/curious-case-ilhan-omar-14724.html

And IF deportation might be in order for someone who has committed those offenses, what’s wrong with a crowd chanting that they want the law enforced?

Meantime, a second member of the amateur anti-American “Squad,” Michigan Democrat Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (Talib?) — the America-hater who famously called the duly elected President of the United States a “mother-fucker” and who “represents” Michigan’s 13th District in West Detroit (though it appears she actually lived across the line in Dearborn on election day, as a result of which 150,000 signatures have already been gathered for her removal — see https://bigleaguepolitics.com/impeach-rashida-tlaib-petition-closes-in-on-150k-signatures/ ) — insisted while testifying in Congress a week back that no person in the United States is or should be called “illegal.”

“No one is illegal. That term is derogatory because it dehumanizes people. You can say any form of maybe ‘coming in without regulations’ or so forth, but the use of ‘illegal’ is disrespectful and I ask my colleagues to try in so many ways to not dehumanize our immigrant neighbors who are trying to come in for safe haven.”

But here’s the thing: I don’t care if you don’t like my calling illegal aliens “illegal aliens.” This is a trick the Left has been trying for decades, with all too much success. They’re trying to control the debate by controlling OUR language — “banning” words with clear meanings so no one will be able to figure out what we’re talking about, or we’ll seem silly to be opposed to something which now sounds so innocuous.

WHAT HARM IN MAKING THINGS ‘SOUND NICER’?

If I engaged in that particularly repulsive crime, I think I’d much rather be called a “Youth Intimacy Facilitator” than “a guy who shoves his blood-engorged member up the tiny rectums of young boys shrieking in pain, terror and shame,” wouldn’t you? So let’s just insist, with Ms. Taliban, “No one is a child-fucker or an infant-buggerer. Those terms are derogatory because they dehumanize people. You can say any form of maybe ‘Youth Romance Counselor’ or so forth, but the use of ‘infant-fucker’ or ‘child-cornholer’ is disrespectful and I ask my colleagues to try in so many ways to not dehumanize our child-loving neighbors who are just trying to have warm and loving relationships by shoving it up these little tykes’ asses until they hemorrhage and scream, sometimes even causing them to bleed to death.”

The criminals to whom Mrs. “Tlaib” refers deserve every bit of derogation and disrespect we can heap on them, because they’re not “our immigrant neighbors,” OK? “Immigrants” — as the overripe pimples who sneer, “Well then, why not deport the First Lady?” understand full well, are people who go through the lengthy, demanding (but wise and careful) process set up to make sure people coming here want to ASSIMILATE AND BECOME AMERICANS, not attack and condemn America and the generations of patriots (yes, many of whom were white Anglo-Saxon males, they came up with a system that rewarded productive work, inquiry, and innovation, live with it) who fought to make America what it is — a perfectly legal and Constitutional immigration process set up by an outfit you may have heard of, called The Congress of the United States.

Illegal aliens are criminals. They’re not seeking “asylum.” Those seeking asylum — under our generous laws set up (however belatedly) to help people like Jews escaping the Nazis in the 1930s — report to a designated point of entry and file their application, or seek asylum in the first safe country they enter (as required by U.N. treaties to which both the U.S. and Mexico are signatories), which in most cases would be Mexico or Guatemala.

Instead, the illegals we’re talking about try to sneak across our borders, WITHOUT APPLYING FOR ASYLUM. Only if caught do they immediately go into their memorized “seeking asylum” palaver in which they’ve been coached by rogue American lawyers who should be brought up on charges as “accessories before the fact” and stripped of their law licenses, if not permanently exiled.

Ninety percent of these calculating liars never show up for their scheduled “asylum” hearings (I wonder why not?) and of those who do, the claims of more than 90 percent are found to be bogus on their face, which (do the math) indicates 99 percent of these lawbreakers are LYING. And they don’t just break the law once, on the day they enter this country in violation of our laws. They KEEP breaking the law every day they’re here, practicing identity theft (a crime) in order to pretend to have Social Security numbers, flooding our schools and hospital emergency rooms without the slightest intention of paying the resulting bills (fraud and theft of services — both crimes.) Etc.

In fact, illegals cost America $116 billion a year IF there are only 12 million of them (a low estimate) (See:
https://www.fairus.org/issue/publications-resources/fiscal-burden-illegal-immigration-united-states-taxpayers .)

But here’s what I find really odd: Rashida Talib (Tlaib, whatever), like all her Democrat colleagues on the Hill -– including the strident but befuddled Alexandra Occasional-Cortex, and that other Muslim who married her brother -– are now Members of Congress, right? That gives them the power to submit legislation, right? And their party currently has a two-year temporary majority in the House.

So if they want ICE abolished, if they want to have open borders, why don’t they just draft and submit legislation repealing all our existing immigration laws, and bring it to a vote? Go ahead and add specific language that America hereby invites another 50 million, 100 million, heck, another 500 million illegal aliens to swarm in here to bankrupt us in a year or two (“free health care for everyone! Yay!”) without benefit of background check or health inspection, without requiring that they learn English or show any knowledge or respect for our laws or Constitution — turning America into Venezuela, where abandoning a form of government designed to protect property rights has in less than a decade left the citizens of what was once the most prosperous nation on that continent competing with rats and crows as they root for something to eat in the garbage dumps?

That’s what they say they want, right? Open borders, no more America, just turn us into an undifferentiated part of the swarming zombie anthill of economically ignorant garbage-pickers, many from parts of the world which consider Female Genital Mutilation to be normal and necessary, where women are considered to be transferable livestock slightly less valuable than cattle, where a sister or daughter who dates “outside the clan” has acid thrown in her face if her family doesn’t murder her outright, and where folk remain unconvinced of the merits of religious tolerance as well as flush toilets and all the other aspects of modern sanitation.

So why not just write it down, give it a bill number, and put it to a vote?

After all, Donald Trump and ICE and the Border Patrol are only doing their best (against a positively demented level of obstruction) to honor their sacred oaths to ENFORCE EXISTING LAWS DULY ENACTED BY CONGRESS . . . right?

Because if they took such a vote and it failed, they’d pretty much have to shut up, wouldn’t they? And the vote would fail . . . just like their vote the other day to impeach Donald Trump failed, drawing fewer than 100 “Ayes” (out of 218 needed, from 95 “Democrat” communists who’d vote to impeach Donald Trump if he balanced the budget, liberated Iran, quarterbacked the Arizona Cardinals to victory in the Super Bowl, and cured cancer, all on the same day . . . right?)

In fact, I’d like to see the Congresscritters given the choice between two proposed bills: One declaring completely open borders for the remaining couple of years this republic might last, and one declaring that any illegal alien found to have entered this country illegally after being deported FIVE times (like Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, who murdered American Kate Steinle in San Francisco in 2015 by shooting her in the back with a stolen handgun), should be hanged by the neck until dead, without any further legal mumbo-jumbo other than making a positive identification. (I mean, such a character has already been adjudicated guilty — with every proper guarantee of due process — FIVE TIMES, right? So you’re not going to whine about “due process,” here — right?)

Is that “derogatory” enough for you, you anti-Semitic, America-hating quack? What do you think would happen to you if the authorities arrested you for illegally entering Turkey, or Jordan, or Red China, or Iran, or Libya -– or any other hellhole that you’re trying desperately to make America resemble –- not the first or second time, but a FIFTH TIME? A free candy bar and you’re welcome to try again?

https://rightedition.com/2019/07/21/three-videos-that-prove-radical-squad-leader-rashida-tlaib-is-a-violent-lunatic-with-unchecked-anger-issues/

ONE GIANT ‘OBSTRUCTION’ TRAP

Meantime, just curious: Back on July 24, why did no one ask Robert Mueller: “Did you order the pre-dawn SWAT raids on the homes of Paul Manafort and Roger Stone, sending in more armed agents than we needed to take out Osama Bin-Laden? Or did Andrew Weissmann or one of the people for whom you were brought in to serve as a doddering figurehead actually order those raids while you were asleep with your head on your desk?

“Why? Were you under the impression Paul Manafort or Roger Stone were Mexican cartel drug-dealers who were likely to use assault rifles and rocket-propelled grenades to resist someone calmly serving a warrant by knocking on the door during business hours? Or were those raids actually your “Hail-Mary Pass,” desperate actions that you hoped would goad Donald Trump into firing you, which firing could then be characterized as “Obstruction of Justice”? wasn’t that the plan?

“In fact, from August of 2017 through the end of 2018, didn’t you spend a year and a half essentially doing NOTHING but attempting to goad Donald Trump into taking some action that could be characterized by your Democrat masters as ‘Obstruction of Justice’? Did you spend $50 million taxpayer dollars doing nothing but running an ‘Obstruction Trap,’ when you could have told us there was no ‘Russian collusion’ by Trump or his team as early as September of 2017 — well before the 2018 midterms?

“And if so . . . don’t you think you should really pay that $50 million back?