Remember all those ‘false positives’? Turns out the CDC has never isolated the COVID-19 virus. Their own documents admit they’ve never even seen it

JON RAPPOPORT REPORTS THEY’VE DEVELOPED A TEST FOR THE PRESENCE OF A ‘VIRUS’ OF WHICH THEY CAN’T PROVE THE VERY EXISTENCE, BY ASSUMING IT ‘MUST BE LIKE’ SOME OTHER VIRUS. THEY CAN’T ACTUALLY SHOW IT, BECAUSE THEY ADMIT THEY’VE NEVER FOUND IT:

Could Mr. Rappoport have a point? If not, why are the “Legacy Media” and “BIG Tech” CENSORING ALL SKEPTICISM, blocking all evidence of harm from these so-called ‘vaccines’ (yes, there’s plenty), and BLOCKING ANY HEALTHY PUBLIC DEBATE? What are they hiding?

Yes, there are some bad respiratory illnesses going around — though how many die DUE TO the “CDC protocols,” while being KEPT OFF cheap, effective Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, we can’t know.

Meantime, I admit I was late figuring this out, but when they started telling us there was a “delta variant,” I finally started asking “In what way is it a variant? If your initial vaccine, on which you spent millions upon millions, proved to pretty much not be working, wouldn’t a good salesman/marketing genius be temped to say, “Oh, the reason it’s not working isn’t that it doesn’t WORK, it’s because you’ve now come down with a new “VARIANT!”?

Why can’t they show us an electron microscope image — heck, even a diagram — of how the new magical delta variant varies from the original? Is there a test that can distinguish the “Delta variant” from the original COVID, or from the “beta variant,” which they never even mention? Do they even have a test that reliably distinguishes COVID from the Flu? How have they proved even THATH test exists, in a double-blind test? Where can we find the peer-reviewed write-up of that “test of their test”? Especially when they admit they’ve never “ISOLATED” the COVID-19 virus so they can take a picture of it, or diagram ir?

If the virus mutated in order to evade the original “jab,” how are “boosters” of the same “jab” supposed to help against the variants? Have they developed NEW VACCINES against the beta variant, the delta variant, the gamma variant? If so, why haven’t they announced that? Because we’d immediately say “Wow, that was quick,” and then ask “So why should we bother with the toxic ‘Delta jab,’ if it’ll do no good against the ‘Epsilon Variant’ which is likely to turn up by February”?

It starts to sound like medieval witch-hunters saying, “Oh, she’s been possessed by the DELTA demon! THAT’S why you can’t find the “devil’s mark” we told you to look for. Of course you can’t SEE the Delta demon, but trust us, only WE can determine it’s there! And unfortunately there are only three cures: drowning, burning at the stake, or being shot up with Remdesevir (approved only for emergency use, unlike hydroxychloroquine and Ivermetin)), placed in an induced coma, and hooked up to a ‘Ventilator.'”

Are “boosters” just a way to move (now pretty much useless) product they’ve got sitting on the shelves?

Brief video of OFFICIAL PRONOUNCEMENTS shows 10-month free-fall of COVID vaccines from a claimed “100 percent effective” to 75 percent, to 50 percent, to 30 percent, to “NOT EFFECTIVE AT ALL”:

TAIWAN: MORE DEATHS FROM TOXIC ‘VACCINATIONS’ THAN FROM COVID-19:

NBA PLAYER GETS BLOOD CLOTS FROM TOXIC COVID ‘JAB,’ CAN’T PLAY; NBA TELLS HIM TO KEEP QUIET ABOUT IT:

200,000-STRONG TRANSPORTATION WORKERS’ UNION WILL REFUSE THE TOXIC ‘JAB’:

GET JABBED OR LOSE YOUR JOB? AIRLINE PILOTS REPLY:

Pfizer has been trying to hide its use of chopped-up baby parts in the development and manufacture of their ‘COVID Jab’:

Chicago Cop Union tells officers to defy ‘Jab’ deadline:

GOVERNOR MILLS OF COMMUNIST EAST GERMANY – OH NO, SORRY, OF THE STATE OF MAINE – SAYS SHE’S NOT BACKING DOWN ON HER THOROUGHLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL ‘COVID JAB’ MANDATE, NO MATTER HOW MANY HOSPITAL PATIENTS WILL DIE BECAUSE OF IT:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/gov-mills-doubles-down-on-vaccine-mandate-as-maine-hospital-cuts-back-services/ar-AAPsqxP

Parent serves Clark County, Nevada, school board with $200 million lawsuit over their COVID crap AT A PUBLIC BOARD MEETING:

GERMAN COURT ORDERS SCREWTUBE TO RESTORE CENSORED VIDEOS ABOUT DANGERS OF THE COVID JAB (GERMANS WILL NOW SEE TRUTHS WHICH ARE STILL CENSORED FOR AMERICANS):

PRE-SCHOOL KIDS ‘ACCIDENTALLY’ GET TOXIC COVID JABS, ARE NOW BEING TREATED FOR HEART DISEASE:

AIN’T GONNA GIVE IN TO YOUR ‘JAB’ MANDATE:

2 Comments to “Remember all those ‘false positives’? Turns out the CDC has never isolated the COVID-19 virus. Their own documents admit they’ve never even seen it”

  1. Henry Says:

    There are too many competing claims at this point to distinguish the fake from the true.

    We’ve all heard the tale of how some scientists insisted that the virus showed signs of artificial origin, then were suddenly silenced by the swamp to the point whre they retracted their claims, then the truth could no longer be suppressed, and now everybody agrees that the virus was artificially cultured.

    How can any of this square with a claim that nobody has ever been able to isolate the virus itself? If not, how did all of the above occur?

  2. Vin Says:

    Hi, Henry — Does Jon Rappoport merely “claim” that “nobody has ever been able to isolate the COVID-19 virus itself”?

    I presume you read Mr. Rappoport’s linked column. The problem with contending this is a “claim” on his part is that he quotes from actual CDC documents. The relevant portion of his column begins:

    CITING FROM JON RAPPOPORT’S COLUMN:

    The CDC document is titled, “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel.” It was originally published in February 2020, in the very early days of the “pandemic,” and it’s latest revision was published in July 2021 (rev: 07, 7/21).

    Buried deep in the document, in a section titled, “Performance Characteristics,” we have this: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV [SARS-CoV-2] are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…” (document page 40, pdf page 41)

    The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV [virus] are currently available…”

    Every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The use of the term “quantified” in that phrase means: the CDC has no virus, because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS.

    One of the two most powerful public health agencies in the world can’t obtain the virus from anywhere. Why? Obviously, because no one has it.

    A further tip-off is the use of the word ‘isolates.” This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE.

    Another way to put it: NO ONE HAS AN ISOLATED SPECIMEN OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS.

    No one has isolated the Covid-19 virus.

    Therefore no one has proved that it exists” . . .

    VIN INTERJECTS:

    Here I break away from Jon Rappoport’s column. We are free to disagree with him. I can’t take you into my laboratory, open a jar, pull out and show you a “measurable piece of gravity.” I can’t show you an electron, demonstrating that, under differing circumstances or methods of measurement, it may behave as a particle or as a wave — and then put it back in my storage jar. Likewise, I can’t show you a “measurable” pulsar, a red dwarf, or a black hole.

    Science is a process of developing theories which seek to explain observed phenomena. Sometimes that requires attributing those phenomena to objects or structures or principles that I can’t place in your hand for your examination, the way I could hand you a hamster or a harmonica, because they’re either very large or very tiny or very far away. Sceintists then develop experiments to test those theories: “If I’m correct that gravity can bend light, during the nexc total eclipse of the sun, you may be able to see along the sun’s edge stars which we know are actually BEHIND the sun . . .”

    So Mr. Rappoport may not have proven COVID-19 “does not exist.”

    But does he merely “claim” that “nobody has ever been able to isolate the virus itself”?

    Mr. Rappoport then continues, in the column I presume anyone might want to click on and read before commenting:

    RAPPOPORT COLUMN CONTINUES:

    “As if this were not a revelation to shock the world, the CDC goes on to say they are presenting a diagnostic PCR test, in that very paper I’m citing, to detect the virus-that-hasn’t-been-isolated. . . and the test is looking for RNA which is PRESUMED to come from the virus that hasn’t been proved to exist.

    “And using this test, the CDC and every other public health agency in the world would go on to count COVID cases and deaths . . . and governments instituted lockdowns and economic devastation using those case and death numbers as justification.

    The pandemic is a fraud, down to the root of the poisonous tree.

    And now, let’s move on to a second key document. This one formed the basis for the first PCR test aimed at detecting the COVID virus all over the world.

    READ WHAT THIS STUDY SAYS. These quotes should be engraved in stone above the entrance to a museum dedicated to the history of medical fraud.

    “We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology [a test for a virus] for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available.”

    TRANSLATION: We want to develop a test to detect the new COVID virus without having the virus.

    “Here we present a validated diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV [SARS-CoV-2] its design relying on close genetic relatedness of 2019-nCoV with [the older 2003] SARS coronavirus, making use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.”

    TRANSLATION: We HAVE developed a diagnostic test to detect the new COVID virus. We ASSUME this new virus exists and is closely related to an older coronavirus. We ASSUME we know HOW it is related. We ASSUME, because we don’t have the new COVID virus. Therefore, all our assumptions are made out of nothing. Actually, we have no proof there is a new coronavirus.”

    (etc.)

    END OUR CITATION FROM MR. RAPPOPORT. VIN NOW CONCLUDES:

    People who are actual virologists could presumably fine-tune Mr. Rappoport’s questions and arguments, rebutting some of them. But given that both the “Mainstream Media” and the “Big Tech social media” have clamped down on, censored, and prevented us from seeing ANY challenges to the “official line” on COVID, while a ravening installed regime of Marxists and Saul Alinsky disciples in Washington teams with Big Pharma and the traitorous bastards at the CDC to use this opportunity to strip us of our liberties in ways that were NEVER EVEN ATTEMPTED (except in the temporary quarantining of very limited areas of massive contagion and death) during epidemics of smallpox, influenza, or polio — is it really wise for us to merely throw up our hands and say “I give up; let them get away with whatever they want; there are too many competing claims”?

    Shouldn’t we be asking a LOT MORE questions, of people who say “You just have to adjust to a new reality: wearing medically useless masks that were ‘only for two weeks’ for decades to come so you can never gather and discuss these things with others in church or tavern, along with our wonderful ‘vaccine passports’ to come — you’ll get used to wearing them, just like gelded cattle get used to wearing their masters’ ear tags!”

    At the very least, isn’t it odd that influenza (“the flu” — a virus that’s been around for at least 105 years) up through 2019 used to routinely claim about 800,000 American lives per year (mostly among the weakened elderly), that we’re told COVID claimed about 800,000 American lives in the year 2020, but that American “flu” deaths miraculously fell almost to zero in 2020? Doesn’t common sense tell us that — the CDC having offered no reliable test that could DIFFERENTIATE between “flu” and “COVID,” meantime instructing hospitals to report every death of someone who was coughing when they entered the hospital as a “COVID death,” that the vast majority of deaths reported as “COVID deaths” may actually have been “flu deaths”?

    Enhanced, of course, by the CDC’s insistence that no one who checked into a hospital with “suspected COVID” should merely be cured with the cheap, safe, proven therapeutics Ivermectin, zinc, intravenous vitamin C, and hydroxychloroquine, but instead should be shot up with dangerous, costly, experimental (literally, “experimental”) Remdesivir, then placed in an induced coma and hooked up with a mechanical “ventilator” breathing machine, a “therapy” from which only 30 pervcent even recover?

    It doesn’t take a medical degree to figure that out — especially if someone was SEEKING a ginned-up “disruptive event” which would allow them to gin up a public panic, which could be used to get the public to accept a new generation of “messenger RNA” vaccines — aided and abetted by left-wing extremists in government who saw said artificially engineered panic as a great way to justify mass mail-in vote fraud (“too dangerous to let people vote in person!”) to keep their sorry asses in office?

    Was anyone seeking that “disruptive event”?

    Actually, in fact, on Oct. 29, 2019 (nearly 2 months before the first reported cases of SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan), Anthony Fauci and Rick Bright went on C-SPAN and spoke of the urgent need to switch over from egg-based vaccine manufacture to mRNA-based vaccines. They said that due to public resistance to gene-based therapies (mRNA), there would need to be some “disruptive” event that causes a scenario where they would not be “beholden to bureaucratic strings and processes.”

    I’ve posted the link that begins with that “smoking gun” revelation again and again. Will no one go and read it?

    https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/10/06/a-compilation-video-following-the-vaccine-science-can-be-troublesome-when-the-vaccine-scientists-have-an-independent-agenda/

    — Vin S.

Comment:

RSS 2.0" title="Subscribe to this posts comments via RSS 2.0">RSS subscribe