Vin Suprynowicz

In a thoroughly orchestrated effort to discredit Donald Trump (how many is this?) a group of old-line Republicans who turned a party once known for attempting to limit government and preserve personal liberties into today’s go-along, “tax, spend, and endless war” party, the “smile, salute, and lose every presidential election to the Marxists in a gentlemanly fashion” party, have supposedly all simultaneously “turned against” GOP nominee Trump after the Washington Post on Oct. 7 & 8 reported on an 11-year-old tape of Trump engaging in some dirty talk.

As though John McCain and Mitt Romney — old-timers clearly apoplectic over billionaire TV personality Donald Trump’s 2016 end run, exposing their total loss of popular support and confidence — were ever for Donald Trump’s plan to lower taxes, encourage private-sector job creation, deport illegal aliens, and keep out Muslim terrorists? And we’re further supposed to believe these men have never heard more tasteless talk, in locker rooms and taverns, a hundred times over? Even though John McCain served in the U.S. Navy? What delicate ears they must have!

The Post’s David Fahrenthold reported Oct. 7/8 – the day before today’s second presidential debate, what a coincidence — “Donald Trump bragged in vulgar terms about kissing, groping and trying to have sex with women during a 2005 conversation caught on a hot microphone, saying that “when you’re a star, they let you do it,” according to a video obtained by The Washington Post.

Obtained from . . . someone in the Bush family?

“The video captures Trump talking with Billy Bush” — nephew of President George H.W. Bush and then of “Access Hollywood” — “on a bus with the show’s name written across the side,” The Post rather breathlessly reports. “They were arriving on the set of ‘Days of Our Lives’ to tape a segment about Trump’s cameo on the soap opera.”

(The Bush family, along with Arizona Sen. John McCain and fellow “gentleman loser” Mitt Romney, lead the GOP’s anti-Trump faction. The most prominent Bushes have vowed to instead vote for Marxist Hillary Clinton. Is anyone shocked? Has any one of these “Republicans” ever attempted to repeal a federal gun control law? A federal tax? To shut down a DEA whose drug war now imprisons a million non-violent Americans, or the economy-crippling EPA, or the murderous, church-raiding BATF, or the tax-slavers at the IRS, or the vastly wasteful and counterproductive DOE or the other vastly wasteful and counterproductive DOE? To reduce federal spending by as much as 10 percent below last year’s?)

“Late Friday night, following sharp criticism by Republican leaders, Trump issued a short video statement saying, ‘I said it, I was wrong, and I apologize,’” The Post reports. “But he also called the revelation ‘a distraction from the issues we are facing today.’ He said that his ‘foolish’ words are much different than the words and actions of Bill Clinton, whom he accused of abusing women, and Hillary Clinton, whom he accused of having ‘bullied, attacked, shamed and intimidated his victims.’”

So the notion that Bill Clinton “abused women” is merely a Trump “accusation,” as is the notion that Hillary went after Bill’s victims? Have we entered The Twilight Zone?

“I’ve never said I’m a perfect person, nor pretended to be someone that I’m not,” Trump stated. “I’ve said and done things I regret, and the words released today on this more than a decade-old video are one of them. Anyone who knows me knows these words don’t reflect who I am,” Trump said.

“I moved on her, and I failed. I’ll admit it,” Trump is heard saying on the tape, about an unnamed woman. It was unclear when the events he was describing took place. The tape was recorded several months after he married his third wife, Melania.

“Whoa,” another voice said.

“I did try and f— her. She was married,” The Post quotes Trump as saying. (If Trump said “fuck her,” one wonders why the Post didn’t see fit to report that. My, how difficult it is for a delicate creature to report on such unsavory doings. Thank goodness the reporter was able to break free from his Bible class at Temperance Society headquarters.)

At that point in the audio, The Post concludes Trump and Bush noticed Arianne Zucker, the actress who was waiting to escort them into the soap-opera set.

“Your girl’s hot as s—, in the purple,” the Post quotes Bush, who’s now a co-host of NBC’s “Today” show, as saying, again leaving its readership to do some fairly easy guesswork.

“Whoa!” Trump says. “Whoa!”

“I’ve got to use some Tic Tacs, just in case I start kissing her,” Trump says. “You know I’m automatically attracted to beautiful -— I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait.”

“And when you’re a star, they let you do it,” Trump says. “You can do anything.”

“Whatever you want,” says another voice, apparently Bush’s.

“Grab them by the p—y,” Trump says. “You can do anything.” (The Post’s readership is left to assume Trump said the word “pussy,” 11 years ago . . . presumably after some head-scratching over the possibilities of “panty” and “penny.” Again, a curious reticence to report the specifics of a conversation that the anything-to-destroy-Trump newspaper apparently considers more important than probing the Obama-Hillary plan to import a million more Islamic terrorist “refugees” bent on imposing Sharia law in America http://www.foreigndesknews.com/lisas-desk/majority-paris-attackers-entered-europe-posing-refugees/ , or Hillary’s massive “Clinton Foundation” bribe-taking.)

‘AND SHE’S GOT THE SWEETEST LITTLE . . .’

Do I wish Donald Trump were a somewhat more refined and proper fellow? Sometimes. While this election is great theater, many of us would surely rather hear about the direction the country might take over the next four years under either of these nominees, than be continually dragged into this kind of discussion on earthy but finally irrelevant matters as the Lamestream Media dutifully follow their weekly marching orders from the Clinton “Opposition Research” and mud-slinging machine.

In fact, all that’s really been accomplished by the vicious, coldly calculated and thoroughly cynical “Opposition Research” campaign of the Clinton Democrats and her many enablers in the media, to this point, is to establish that Donald Trump is a regular guy, as opposed to a professional politician who’s been carefully crafting a hypocritical image as a churchgoing puritan for the past 50 years (See Bill Clinton writing while still in college that he didn’t want his seeking of Vietnam draft deferments to damage his future ability to seek public office. See Barack Obama’s ongoing masquerade as a churchgoing Christian.)

And isn’t a normal, private-sector American –- as opposed to another disciple of the Cult of Endlessly Larger Government, someone who’s never had to meet a payroll — what the country really wants and needs?

In fact, it’s unclear that a less worldly, less self-confident man could have stood up so well and so long to this massive, orchestrated Democratic/Media attack -– which, make no mistake, would have been leveled in a similar form no matter who stood in Miss Hillary’s path, this fall.

OK. As the Hillary Democrats and their media allies have decided we should spend the next month in the gutter, let me relate my own a third-hand political story -– as the Washington Post just did. I was not present at the dinner conversation I now report, any more than Post reporter Fahrenthold was on that bus, 11 years ago. Though I consider my source quite credible.

During most of my 20-odd years at the Las Vegas Review-Journal — Nevada’s big daily — the newspaper was owned by Stephens Media, out of Little Rock, Arkansas. Very occasionally, CEO Warren Stephens, who’d taken over the family business from his father Jack, would visit our offices in Las Vegas. Standing in my office at the newspaper late one afternoon, he told me and the then-publisher about a dinner meeting he attended in an Arkansas restaurant with then-Gov. Bill Clinton, at which Mr. Stephens pitched the governor on a business enterprise he was considering in the state.

He reported that Bill Clinton unabashedly told him what a state approval of that idea would cost him -– a round figure in the tens of thousands of dollars -– leaving no doubt that this payment was not to go to any Arkansas state agency, but directly to Bill Clinton, in cash.

(Mr. Stephens didn’t tell me whether he decided to pay the requested bribe. I didn’t ask.)

During the course of the restaurant meeting in question, Mr. Stephens, who was already a bit surprised by the casual aplomb with which the precise figure of the demanded bribe had been presented -– seeming to indicate this was an everyday way of doing business for that governor -– told me he was then further surprised when the waitress came around to take their order, eventually standing next to Gov. Clinton.

Mr. Stephens told me Bill Clinton then smiled in his charming way, asking if the other gentlemen at the table didn’t agree the waitress was very pretty. Bill Clinton then reached his hand down between the waitress’ legs, grabbed her crotch, and said, “And she’s got the sweetest little cunt in Arkansas.”

(Oh dear, was I supposed to write “c–t”? I suppose this means I can give up any hope of ever seeking employment at the Delicate and Sensitive Washington Post, which reports such things so reluctantly.)

Bill Clinton is a serial sexual predator, and an accused rapist. Juanita Broaddrick’s account of this man’s rape of her is highly credible. (He came twice.) He groped White House volunteer Kathleen Willey in the oval office (on the day her husband committed suicide), and forced his sexual attentions on Arkansas state employee Paula Jones in an Arkansas hotel. (If many women have feared for their jobs should they reject the advances of a mere office manager, how much harder is it for blue-collar state employee to flee her state’s governor, when she knows an armed state trooper is standing guard outside the door, fully aware of what’s being demanded of her?)

There have been others, many still afraid to speak out in detail in public. Bill Clinton was impeached by the U.S House of representatives for lying about these crimes. It was in all the papers.

Does anyone doubt Bill Clinton believes “And when you’re a star, they let you do it; you can do anything”? Do we need a recording?

Meantime, and more to today’s point (since Bill Clinton is barred from running again, on his own), Hillary Clinton from 1993-2001 helped run the White House “bimbo eruption war room,” whose job was to demonize Bill Clinton’s accusers, making them out to be lying whores. Remember the Clintons’ employee, James Carville, saying of Paula Jones “That’s what you get when you drag a hundred-dollar bill through a trailer park”?

This is old news, for heaven’s sake. So why isn’t anyone demanding the Hillary Clinton drop out of the presidential race? She does intend to move Bill Clinton back into the White House, doesn’t she? Which is more important -– what Mr. Trump said in an unguarded moment eleven years ago, bragging tastelessly as many men will, or what the Clintons have actually DONE, systematically, repeatedly -– attempting to besmirch and ridicule and ruin the reputation of the rape and sexual assault victims of a repeat offender, in order to intimidate them into silence and prevent others from coming forward — for decades?

Remember Monica Lewinsky? When she reported she’d had a sexual relationship with President Clinton in the White House – which included his giving her sexual pleasure by means of a cigar — Hillary’s “Bimbo Eruption Team” got busy, preparing to ruin the reputation of that young woman, whose family had entrusted her to the White House as an intern, presuming the Clintons would serve as responsible guardians. They were actually prepared to bring forth a teacher with whom Miss Lewinsky had reportedly had an affair while she was in college, whose wife was willing to assert that when Miss Lewinsky first left for Washington, she vowed “to get my presidential kneepads.” ( http://articles.latimes.com/1998/jan/28/news/mn-13032 .)

What brought that berserk reputation-destroying operation to a screeching halt after it was already in gear? Why, it came out that Monica Lewinsky had fortuitously preserved, unwashed, a blue dress stained with Bill Clinton’s semen, which could be proved to be his and no one else’s through DNA testing. That’s the only reason Hillary Clinton and her “bimbo team” didn’t succeed in consigning Monica Lewinsky’s name to their trophy list of “lying whores.”

If you’re too young to remember all this, or the memories have merely faded as you hoped you’d never have to re-live them, check out http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3106180/Longtime-Bill-Clinton-sex-assault-accuser-says-Hillary-enabled-happen-again.html or http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/05/07/bills-sex-accusers-echo-trump-hillary-enabler/ or http://thefederalist.com/2015/09/21/hillary-clinton-is-no-friend-to-sexual-assault-survivors/ .

WHAT KIND OF PERSON SAYS ‘THAT 12-YEAR-OLD WANTED TO BE RAPED’?

THIS is what the mainstream media -– and the octogenarian Republican has-beens who suspect they and their compromising ways will be “out in the cold” in the event of a populist Trump victory — are trying to distract you from, as they continue attempting to keep Donald Trump on the defensive, to prevent him from landing body blows on precisely these topics, where the Clintons’ KNOWN and PROVABLE offenses make anything they’ve got on Donald Trump look like kindergarten playground stuff.

Why do you think Bill Clinton was impeached and disbarred? Not for adultery. Because the Clintons always lie about it, and because just twice they were caught red-handed (or “blue-dressed.”) (In the second major count, Bill Clinton was also charged with lying in his deposition in the Paula Jones lawsuit.)

Bill Clinton was impeached by the House, mind you, but not convicted and removed by the Senate, where not a single Democrat was willing to vote “guilty” based on the evidence, giving us a permanent record of the kind of behavior which the leaders of that party consider appropriate in a president.

Now, keeping in mind the way Hillary Clinton — supposed champion of women’s rights — treated those victims of the known repeat sexual assailant she’s been protecting for decades, watch this -– it’s not very long — and pay particular attention to Hillary’s laughter: http://www.infowars.com/the-rapist-and-the-enabler/ .

Also see details in print: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3729466/Child-rape-victim-comes-forward-time-40-years-call-Hillary-Clinton-liar-defended-rapist-smearing-blocking-evidence-callously-laughing-knew-guilty.html .

Far from denying any of this, Hillary acknowledges it all happened. (The 12-year-old victim, above.) Her defense? She was “just doing her job.””

Her defense: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-clinton-stands-by-her-defense-of-1975-rape-suspect/ .